Thursday, March 17, 2011

Visual Culture Project 4. Frames of Reference.




The Artwork i chose was the 1934, oil on canvas painting, "The Rape", by Rene Magritte (1898 - 1967). The image is created on a fairly unappealing background with no focal points of interest but seems to resemble a horizon. The only real line and texture of this image is focused in the hair of the female subject in the centre foreground. According to Spalding, the 72.4 x 53.3 cm piece is an optical red herring leading the responders eyes wandering through the work. The first image seen by the viewer is the face and head of a female subject, quickly turned into the surreal, sexual image of a naked body, "her eyes are actually her nipples, and her pinched mouth is her pubic triangle." He then continues to interpret the image as the 'attitude' and views of the artist in the period of surrealism as it's appearance becomes unreal, or in his words, "a super-reality." Spalding believes the work is the realistic, blunt version of human wants and cravings.

My interpretation of "The Rape", contrasts Spaldings. Despite my acceptance of the surrealist movement having an influence on this work and the subjects face being a sexual representation of lust, needs and "desires", i believe the sexual connotation in the work is slightly more sexist and derogatory. The first impression of this work that i got, was the depreciation of women by the male eye through their sexual urges and the name makes me think that the woman is realistically viewing the pressures of his cravings, or feeling as though she is a sexual object. This idea crossed my mind due to the social environment i was raised in throughout my life, with a comfortable socioeconomic status and a surrounding female influence. My lesson throughout the years through education, political battles, and in the home environment, has been that women will always be seen as a less physically superior race and carry the sexual image as a challenge every day. The artists work reminds me of the power women posses of their own bodies that often isn't controlled or isn't of concern. Although this painting does not interest me as an artwork i would hang on my wall or stare at for hours on end, i do appreciate it and the meanings behind it, as it makes me feel curious and provokes thought, which i believe is the aim of most artists in the current world.

Acknowledgements.

Spalding, J, The Art Of Wonder A History Of Seeing, Prestil

Image: Magritte, R, 1934, 'The Rape', Menil Foundation Collection, Texis, pp. 265-266. Chapter 10.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Week 3. Harvard Referencing Task.

Due to being away for that lecture, I was clearly unsure how to complete this task fully .... BUT this is what i did do, hopefully up to standard or right.


  • Dean, J 2009, 'Arthur Frommers', Arthur Frommers Budget Travel, vol 12 01 July 2009.
  • Looymans, C. 2008, 'Layer Basics', Australian Photography, October 2008, pp22-26Hooper, J & Hooper, T 1978, A Guide To Collecting Australiana, South Melbourne.
  • O'Meara, J. 2001, 'Electric Art', Capture Commercial Photography Magazine, July/ August 2001, pp. 24-27.
  • Reddy, J 2009, 'Frequent Flyer', The Sydney Morning Herald, 05 December 2009.
  • Warhol, A 2007, Andy Warhol, Queensland Art Gallery, South Brisbane.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Project 1. "Is It Any Good?"

The piece of work that i chose to study was the 2008 glass blown sculpture by Peter Bremers, called "Antarctic Splendour - Double Graal." The "46 x 42 x 41" piece of work is seen in the Craft Arts International, issue 76 in 2009.

I like the work due to the interesting colours of turquoise, blue, green and white all en crafted in the swirled smooth texture of the sculpture. The composition of the work on its side creates a visual interest for me as it's a metaphoric symbol for the ice burgs in Antarctica, revealing their delicate beauty and rarity. The image of water and ice is clearly depicted through his contemporary reflection on the environment that inspired him and his creative approach to fine art.